Last updated: 2025-06-28
Everyone has the right not to be arbitrarily detained or imprisoned. Charter s.9.
The Criminal Code protects the liberty of suspects.
For all but the most serious offences, the law discourages you
from arresting offenders. If you do arrest, the law
encourages you release suspects with the least restrictions
necessary. However, when you have reasonable grounds to
believe that someone committed an offence, section 495 of the
Criminal Code authorizes you to arrest people. For hybrid and
summary conviction offences, you may only you may arrest
suspects in order to:
You may arrest a person who has breached a conditional
sentence order. s.742.6(1)(b).
Unless
the
breach
was very minor, you shouldn't release someone who breached a
conditional sentence. s.742.6(2).
If you do impose conditions on a suspect which protect
victims or witnesses, complete and submit a Protection
Order Registry form.
If you do not release the prisoner, s.
503 requires you to bring him or her before a JP without
unreasonable delay, and in any case within 24 hours. (Dumont
2005 BCPC 204)
But within that time, if your investigation is continuing expeditiously, you are not obliged to interrupt it. R. v. Storrey 1990 SCC; Tate 2002 BCCA 189; Viszlai, 2012 BCCA 442; Viszlai, 2015 BCCA 495.
It does not appear to be an abuse of process to arrest a
suspect, and then release without conditions or charges. R.
v. Orr, 2021 BCCA 42
Peace officers's powers of arrest without warrant are
described in s.495
of the Criminal Code. Section 495(1)
causes little difficulty. If you have reasonable
grounds to believe that a suspect committed a hybrid or
indictable offence, you can arrest. s.495(1)(a).
To arrest for a summary conviction offence, you must find the
suspect committing it.
Courts differ whether you must actually see the offence
occurring, or merely have reasonable grounds to believe that it
is occurring at the time you deal with the suspect. In Janvier,
2007 SKCA 147, the court says you must actually observe the
offence; but in S.T.P.,
2009 NSCA 86, and Boyd,
2013 BCCA 19 the courts found that you may draw reasonable
inferences from your observations to conclude that the person
"is committing" an offence.
But section 495(2) causes problems: when shouldn't an officer arrest for a hybrid or summary offence?
Section 495(2) applies only to Absolute Jurisdiction, Hybrid, and Summary Conviction offences. It does not apply to the straight indictable offences.
Section 495(2) refers to what a police officer knows at the time of arrest. If the officer believes that identity, evidence and the continued peace are secure[1], then the officer should not arrest. If the officer is in doubt[2] about these things, it appears that the officer may still arrest[3], though some cases suggest that the officer should investigate first and arrest later[4].
Attendance at court is slightly different. If the officer has no information, or mere suspicion that the suspect is a bad risk to attend court, the officer must not arrest. To rely on this ground, the officer must already have reasonable grounds for concern.
To summarize: the officer may arrest if unsure of
identity, evidence or future peace, and arrest would assist in
solving these problems.[5] However, the
officer needs reasonable grounds to believe offender won’t
attend court if the officer decides to arrest for that
purpose.
Section 31 of the Criminal Coce provides you with the power to arrest for "breach of the peace". Use this power sparingly. You can only arrest people for the conduct you see them committing. Although you, (and civilians s.30) can interfere to stop a breach of the peace, the history of this concept limits it. You can't arrest someone under this section just because they're being difficult, or may commit an offence. Lefebvre (1984 BCCA); Bergstrom, 2007 BCSC 1990. You need to believe that if you don't arrest the person, s/he will harm someone or damage someone's property. C.E., 2009 NSSC 6.
You can't arrest people for breach of the peace who are merely suspicious. Nor can you confront such people, and then arrest them for breach of the peace when they object to your interference. Januska (1996 Ont S.C.) Khatchadorian (1998 BCCA).
If you do arrest someone under this power, there is no substantive offence on which they can be released on terms.The "RICE" principles don't apply. Because there is no offence,
you can't search the person for evidence of the offence for
which you have arrested. Because there won't be charges you
can't arrest for the purposes of releasing for court. I'm not
sure that you can compel the person to identify themselves,
because the only need for obtaining their identity is to bring
them to court. But if you have concern for your safety, then I'm
pretty sure that you can search them for weapons that they might
use to harm you. Cloutier
v. Langlois, 1990 CanLII 122.
This offence trips confuses officers often because it is
narrower than it appears. The elements are:
As police officers responding to a complaint, you are not
"disturbed". Swinkels,
2010 ONCA 742. Even if the suspect aggravates a tense
situation by swearing at you, he does not cause a
disturbance. Kukemueller,
2014 ONCA 295
The other problem is that it's a summary conviction offence.
You can only arrest the suspect if you find him or her
committing it.
You can arrest someone for causing a disturbance only if:
If however, you are dealing with an unrelated matter, and the
suspect interferes with your work by doing the things mentioned
above, you can be disturbed. (You might also be
obstructed.)
You can't arrest people for being rude or disrespectful to you. Their actions must actually interfere with a specific job you are doing. It's not enough that you are merely at work. Noel, 1995 CanLII 1105 (BC C.A.).
Only when a suspect has an obligation to identify himself or herself, for example when being released to attend court, refusal to do so is obstruction. Moore, [1979] 1 S.C.R. 195; Lawrence, 2005 BCSC 255.
Otherwise, when you detain a suspect,
the suspect has no obligation to tell you who they are.
Guthrie,
1982 ABCA 201
If you enter property without permission, and are asked to leave, you (generally) become a trespasser. You aren't in the execution of your duty if you're breaking the law. Plamondon, 1997 BCCA. (Of course, exigent circumstances may justify your attendance even if the resident asks you to leave. Stenning, [1970] S.C.R. 631)
Police often arrest a person for being "drunk in a public place" under provincial legislation. (In B.C., it's s.47 of the Liquor Control and Licencing Act). However, the legislation does not authorize you to arrest every drunk in public, but only those drunks who are a menace to themselves, others, or to property.
In some provinces, the legislation limits those arrests to situations where the person is a danger to himself or others or is causing a disturbance.
In the other provinces, the common law sets the same limits. eg R. v. Wallace (1998), 59 C.R.R. (2d) 153 (B.C.S.C).
If you find a drunk person in a private place, such as a car, and tell him to get out into a public place, you can't now arrest him for DIPP. Guray, 2015 BCCA 183
If you arrest a person for any offence, (particularly impaired
driving), you can imprison him only for so long as you think
he's a danger to himself or others. This doesn't require
constant monitoring, but does require case-by-case consideration
of how long that will take. Hardy,
2015 MBCA 51. You can't "hold till sober"; but if the reason for
arrest was intoxication, then you can "hold till safe" to
release.
When a mental disorder causes a person to commit an offence,
the Review Board or a court may impose a "disposition" on the
person. These are orders designed to keep the person from
relapsing into a dangerous mental disorder.
A peace officer who finds someone who has, or is about to,
violate a term of a disposition order may arrest the
person. s.672.91
After such an arrest, you must either:
Although superior courts can issue arrest warrants which can be executed anywhere in Canada, most warrants are issued by provincial court judges and JPs. Those warrants can only be executed in the province where they were issued, unless a justice in another province authorizes it. s.528.
If you know that authorities in another province will return a suspect there, you can:
Detention differs from arrest. You need reasonable and probable grounds to believe that the suspect committed an offence in order to arrest. But if you have a reason, beyond mere hunch, to suspect a person of involvement in criminal activity, you may detain the person for a short time to investigate further.
Dedman
(1985 SCC) Wilson
(1990 SCC) Ladouceur
(1990 SCC) Hufsky
(1988 SCC) Cooper
(2005 NSCA)
However, you should control the scene by detaining the people you find in the residence, for the purposes of protecting yourselves and preventing damage to or destruction of evidence.
Sections 496
to 503
oblige officers to release suspects with the least restrictions
of liberty necessary under the circumstances. This
includes releasing with the intention to summons later.
See table.
Sections 499 and 503 permit police officers and officers in charge to release suspects on undertakings and recognizances with specific conditions. The two sections provide the same list of conditions. Case law says you have an obligation to consider releasing any prisoner you can using this procedure. Rashid 2010 ONCA 591.
For those conditions to remain in
force, an information must be sworn before the date of the
first appearance.[6] The undertaking lasts until the charges are
resolved by conviction, acquittal or stay, or the court
changes them. (See Form
11.1)
Although that list of conditions can address many risks, they do not grant peace officers blanket authority to impose any condition necessary. The most commonly misunderstood condition is the one addressed to witness and victim safety. It does not permit conditions to protect potential future victims.
Factors which justify more restrictive forms of release and more restrictive conditions are:
If no combination of the conditions
will suffice to address these issues, then the accused must be
brought before a justice for a bail hearing under s.515. The justice may impose more
restrictive conditions, using more restrictive release
documents such as recognizance's with cash or surety, or the
justice may detain the accused pending trial.
If you release a suspect on a promise to appear, appearance
notice or recognizance before an officer in charge, then you
must swear an information "as soon as practicable".
s.505 Failure to do so means the accused doesn't have to
attend court. Oliveira,
2009 ONCA 219.
Ordinarily, you want suspects to obey the terms of s.11.1 undertakings. Even if you are a bit slow swearing one, but swear it before the promise to appear date, then the undertaking still binds the suspect. Oliveira, 2009 ONCA 219. But those undertakings expire on the PTA date if nobody swears an information before then. Killaly, 2010 BCPC 138.
Can a police officer release a prisoners charged with a straight indictable offence such as robbery, or arrested on unendorsed warrants? Although there is some debate about the issue, the answer appears to be yes. R. v. L. (M.C.), 2005 ONCJ 124; R. v. Monkman, 2005 YKTC 19.
Under s.503(2), you have a discretion
to release such a prisoner, but only if you are satisfied that
the prisoner "should be
released".
Some case law in B.C. suggests that you cannot fingerprint people until charges are laid. (Click here for more discussion.) Section 501(3) authorizes you to release a suspect on a promise to appear or recognizance, to provide fingerprints later, when the charge is sworn. It's an offence under s.145(5) for the accused not to appear.
The law requires you to choose the least restrictive form of release that you consider appropriate. If, however, you have reasonable grounds to believe that a form of release fails to:
then you must move to a more restrictive form of release. If no form of release available to you will suffice, then you must bring the offender before a justice.
If the offender was arrested for fear that they will
commit an offence, then you must take the offender before a
justice within 24 hours, or so soon as practicable. S.503(4).
If
there
is
an ongoing risk that the person will commit an offence, but
has committed none so far, proceed with a peace bond
application under s.810
or 810.1.
If
the
risk
remains
high, seek very restrictive conditions, such as 24-hour curfew
to be reviewed weekly by the court. It may be time to
stake out your subject’s house.
|
Process |
Offence |
Type of Arrest |
Residence of Accused |
Authority |
|
Release with intention to summons later. 497(1)(a) |
or ? 5 years |
Not arrested or Arrested w/o warrant |
Anywhere |
Peace officer s.497(1)(a) OIC s.498(1)(a) |
|
Appearance Notice |
? 5 years |
Not arrested or Arrested w/o warrant |
Anywhere |
Peace officer s.496 s.497(1)(b) |
|
Without conditions |
All offences* in province |
Arrested with or without warrant |
Anywhere |
OIC or another officer s.498(b) |
|
All offences*in
province |
Arrested with or without warrant |
Anywhere |
OIC s.499(2) |
|
|
Recognizance before OIC
[youth] No deposit no conditions |
or ? 5 years |
Arrested without warrant |
In the province and less than 200 km from here. |
OIC or another officer s.498(1)(c) |
|
Recognizance before OIC [youth] Up to $500 cash deposit no conditions |
or ? 5 years |
Arrested without warrant |
Outside province or more than 200 km from here. |
OIC or another officer s.498(1)(d) |
|
Recognizance before OIC [youth] No deposit, Specified conditions** |
All offences* |
Arrested with or without warrant |
In the province and less than 200 km from here. |
OIC s.499(2)(b) Peace officer or OIC 503(2) |
|
Recognizance before OIC [youth] Up to $500 cash deposit |
All offences* |
Arrested with or without warrant |
Outside province or more than 200km from here. |
OIC s.499(2)(c) Peace officer or OIC 503(2) |
|
All offences* |
Any arrest |
Anywhere |
JJP s.515 |
People arrested without warrant for an indictable offence committed outside the local jurisdiction must be taken before a Justice. S.503(3).
Offences committed outside the province are outside your
jurisdiction. You cannot serve them any document.
If the offence was indictable, however, you may seek a 6-day
remand (s.503(3))
for
police
in
another province to transport the accused
Only a Supreme Court Judge may release people charged with the following offences:
|
47 |
Treason |
61 |
Sedition |
|
49 |
Alarming Her Majesty |
74 |
Piracy |
|
51 |
Intimidating Parliament |
75 |
Piratical Acts |
|
53 |
Inciting Mutiny |
235 |
Murder |
Sections 499and
503list
the
same
set
of conditions available to a peace officer. Do not add conditions
beyond what are found in this list; the courts won't enforce
them.
(a) to remain within a territorial jurisdiction specified in the undertaking;
(b) to notify a peace officer or another person mentioned in the undertaking of any change in his or her address, employment or occupation;
(c) to abstain from communicating, directly or indirectly, with any victim, witness or other person identified in the undertaking, or from going to a place specified in the undertaking, except in accordance with the conditions specified in the undertaking;
(d) to deposit the person's passport with the peace officer or other person mentioned in the undertaking;
(e) to abstain from possessing a firearm and to surrender any firearm in the possession of the person and any authorization, licence or registration certificate or other document enabling that person to acquire or possess a firearm;
(f) to report at the times specified in the undertaking to a peace officer or other person designated in the undertaking;
(g) to abstain from
(i) the consumption of alcohol or other intoxicating substances, or
(ii) the consumption of drugs except in accordance with a medical prescription; and
(h) to comply with any other condition specified in the
undertaking that the officer in charge
considers necessary to ensure the safety and security of any
victim of or witness to the offence.[6]
A summary conviction
offence is tried in Provincial Court.
Neither the Crown nor the Defence have any option to proceed
in any other way. These offences usually carry a maximum
punishment of 6 months.
Hybrid offences can
be prosecuted summarily or by indictment, at the Crown’s option.
Absolute Jurisdiction334 theft under $5,000 354 possession stolen property under $5,000 362(2)(b) false pretences under $5,000 380(1)(b) fraud under $5,000 393 Fare fraud 733.1 Breach probation 811 Breach peace bond 201(1) gaming house 203 bookies 210(1) common bawdy house |
Summary Conviction66 Unlawful Assembly 83 Prize Fight 89 Weapon at public meeting 173(1) Indecent Act 175 Cause Disturbance 177 Trespass by Night 335 Take Auto without Consent 372 Indecent or Harassing Telephone Calls 446 Cruelty to Animals
CDSA 4(1) Possession of a controlled substance
All offences under Provincial statutes. |
||
Hybrid Offences
|
|||
[1] A police officer who arrests an impaired driver may hold the driver if he has concerns that the driver is a danger to himself or others if released. Tugnum 2002 BCSC 1572; Christiansen 2003 BCSC 1824.
[2]Collins v. Brantford Police Services 2001 Ont C.A. A police officer attended a dispute between neighbors. The trial court found as a fact that the concerns identified in s.495(2) were satisfied, but the appeal court said the trial judge erred in failing to consider the officer’s belief. A judge in BC also applied this subjective analysis: R. v. Lau 2002 BCPC 294. See also R. v. Douglas 2003 BCPC 392 (same judge).
[3] In R.
v. Effa 2005 BCPC 0574, the officer arrested a person
who the judge thought didn't need to be arrested. But the
judge conceded that the officer was entitled to arrest
anyway. The judge agreed that the officer had reasonable and
probable grounds to believe that the accused had committed
an offence. The judge conceded that the officer might not
have had reasonable and probable grounds to believe that the
accused would not commit further offences. And so the arrest
was lawful.
Freeman
v. West Vancouver(District)
(1992), 71 B.C.L.R. (2d) 387
(C.A.) Leave to appeal to the Supreme Court
of Canada was denied: (1993), 77 B.C.L.R. (2d) xxxi
Police found an innocent man in a very suspicious
situation. He could not produce identification.
They arrested him. He sued, unsuccessfully.
[4] In R. v. Dobrotic , (1997 NSCA) the court seemed to reverse the language of the section, so that the officers needed reasonable grounds to believe the public interest issues needed resolving before an officer could arrest. Kucher v. Guasparini [1998] B.C.J. No. 582 (BCSC) says before arresting, the officer must consider whether the public interest concerns can be resolved some other way. But Regina v. Sieben 51 C.C.C. (3d) 343 (Alta C.A.) points out that the analysis must be done in the heat of the moment, not with the luxury of afterthought.
| Top
|
Home |
Contact |