Police Officer's Powers of Arrest and Release

Last updated: 2025-06-28

General Principles

 Everyone has the right not to be arbitrarily detained or imprisoned. Charter s.9.

The Criminal Code protects the liberty of suspects.  For all but the most serious offences, the law discourages you from arresting offenders.  If you do arrest, the law encourages you release suspects with the least restrictions necessary.  However, when you have reasonable grounds to believe that someone committed an offence, section 495 of the Criminal Code authorizes you to arrest people. For hybrid and summary conviction offences, you may only you may arrest suspects in order to:

  1. establish the identity of the suspect,
  2. secure or preserve evidence of or relating to the offence,
  3. prevent the continuation or repetition of the offence,
  4. prevent the commission of another offence,
  5. ensure the suspect will attend court.

You may arrest a person who has breached a conditional sentence order. s.742.6(1)(b).  Unless the breach was very minor, you shouldn't release someone who breached a conditional sentence.  s.742.6(2).

If you do impose conditions on a suspect which protect victims or witnesses, complete and submit a Protection Order Registry form.

If you do not release the prisoner, s. 503 requires you to bring him or her before a JP without unreasonable delay, and in any case within 24 hours.  (Dumont 2005 BCPC 204)

But within that time, if your investigation is continuing expeditiously, you are not obliged to interrupt it.  R. v. Storrey 1990 SCC; Tate 2002 BCCA 189; Viszlai, 2012 BCCA 442; Viszlai, 2015 BCCA 495.

It does not appear to be an abuse of process to arrest a suspect, and then release without conditions or charges. R. v. Orr, 2021 BCCA 42

Arrest

Warrantless Arrest for an Offence

Indictable & Hybrid - Arrest on reasonable grounds

Peace officers's powers of arrest without warrant are described in s.495 of the Criminal Code.  Section 495(1) causes little difficulty.  If you have reasonable grounds to believe that a suspect committed a hybrid or indictable offence, you can arrest. s.495(1)(a).

Summary Conviction - "Finds committing"

To arrest for a summary conviction offence, you must find the suspect committing it.

Courts differ whether you must actually see the offence occurring, or merely have reasonable grounds to believe that it is occurring at the time you deal with the suspect.  In Janvier, 2007 SKCA 147, the court says you must actually observe the offence; but in S.T.P., 2009 NSCA 86, and Boyd, 2013 BCCA 19 the courts found that you may draw reasonable inferences from your observations to conclude that the person "is committing" an offence. 

"RICE" - Shall not arrest except in the public interest

But section 495(2) causes problems: when shouldn't an officer arrest for a hybrid or summary offence?

Section 495(2) applies only to Absolute Jurisdiction, Hybrid, and Summary Conviction offences.  It does not apply to the straight indictable offences. 

Section 495(2) refers to what a police officer knows at the time of arrest.  If the officer believes that identity, evidence and the continued peace are secure[1], then the officer should not arrest.  If the officer is in doubt[2] about these things, it appears that the officer may still arrest[3], though some cases suggest that the officer should investigate first and arrest later[4].

Attendance at court is slightly different.  If the officer has no information, or mere suspicion that the suspect is a bad risk to attend court, the officer must not arrest.  To rely on this ground, the officer must already have reasonable grounds for concern.

To summarize: the officer may arrest if unsure of identity, evidence or future peace, and arrest would assist in solving these problems.[5]  However, the officer needs reasonable grounds to believe offender won’t attend court if the officer decides to arrest for that purpose.

Breach of the Peace

Section 31 of the Criminal Coce provides you with the power to arrest for "breach of the peace".  Use this power sparingly.  You can only arrest people for the conduct you see them committing.  Although you, (and civilians s.30) can interfere to stop a breach of the peace, the history of this concept limits it.  You can't arrest someone under this section just because they're being difficult, or may commit an offence.  Lefebvre (1984 BCCA); Bergstrom, 2007 BCSC 1990.  You need to believe that if you don't arrest the person, s/he will harm someone or damage someone's property.  C.E., 2009 NSSC 6.

You can't arrest people for breach of the peace who are merely suspicious.  Nor can you confront such people, and then arrest them for breach of the peace when they object to your interference. Januska (1996 Ont S.C.) Khatchadorian (1998 BCCA).

If you do arrest someone under this power, there is no substantive offence on which they can be released on terms.

The "RICE" principles don't apply. Because there is no offence, you can't search the person for evidence of the offence for which you have arrested. Because there won't be charges you can't arrest for the purposes of releasing for court. I'm not sure that you can compel the person to identify themselves, because the only need for obtaining their identity is to bring them to court. But if you have concern for your safety, then I'm pretty sure that you can search them for weapons that they might use to harm you. Cloutier v. Langlois, 1990 CanLII 122.

Causing a Disturbance s.175(1) Criminal Code

This offence trips confuses officers often because it is narrower than it appears.  The elements are:

The problem usually falls on the interpretation of "disturbed".

The "disturbance" must be more than a fleeting event. Penton, 2022 NLCA 47. Loud and raucus behaviour doesn't disturb anyone if everyone is being loud and raucus. Swinkels, 2010 ONCA 742. If a group of people go out to the street to watch two people fight, none of the group is "disturbed" because none of them interfered with the activities of the others: the fighters are fighting, and the observers wanted to watch. B.(J.G.V.), 2002 NSCA 65.

As police officers responding to a complaint, you are not "disturbed". Swinkels, 2010 ONCA 742.  Even if the suspect aggravates a tense situation by swearing at you, he does not cause a disturbance.  Kukemueller, 2014 ONCA 295

The other problem is that it's a summary conviction offence. You can only arrest the suspect if you find him or her committing it.

You can arrest someone for causing a disturbance only if:

If however, you are dealing with an unrelated matter, and the suspect interferes with your work by doing the things mentioned above, you can be disturbed.  (You might also be obstructed.)

Obstructing or Resisting a Peace Officer

You can't arrest people for being rude or disrespectful to you.  Their actions must actually interfere with a specific job you are doing.  It's not enough that you are merely at work.  Noel, 1995 CanLII 1105 (BC C.A.).

Only when a suspect has an obligation to identify himself or herself, for example when being released to attend court, refusal to do so is obstruction.  Moore, [1979] 1 S.C.R. 195; Lawrence, 2005 BCSC 255.

Otherwise, when you detain a suspect, the suspect has no obligation to tell you who they are.  Guthrie, 1982 ABCA 201

If you enter property without permission, and are asked to leave, you (generally) become a trespasser.  You aren't in the execution of your duty if you're breaking the law.  Plamondon, 1997 BCCA.  (Of course, exigent circumstances may justify your attendance even if the resident asks you to leave.  Stenning, [1970] S.C.R. 631)

Drunk in a Public Place

Police often arrest a person for being "drunk in a public place" under provincial legislation.  (In B.C., it's s.47 of the Liquor Control and Licencing Act).  However, the legislation does not authorize you to arrest every drunk in public, but only those drunks who are a menace to themselves, others, or to property.

In some provinces, the legislation limits those arrests to situations where the person is a danger to himself or others or is causing a disturbance.

In the other provinces, the common law sets the same limits.  eg R. v. Wallace (1998), 59 C.R.R. (2d) 153 (B.C.S.C).

If you find a drunk person in a private place, such as a car, and tell him to get out into a public place, you can't now arrest him for DIPP. Guray, 2015 BCCA 183

If you arrest a person for any offence, (particularly impaired driving), you can imprison him only for so long as you think he's a danger to himself or others. This doesn't require constant monitoring, but does require case-by-case consideration of how long that will take. Hardy, 2015 MBCA 51. You can't "hold till sober"; but if the reason for arrest was intoxication, then you can "hold till safe" to release.

Breach of Disposition - Mental Disorder

When a mental disorder causes a person to commit an offence, the Review Board or a court may impose a "disposition" on the person.  These are orders designed to keep the person from relapsing into a dangerous mental disorder.

A peace officer who finds someone who has, or is about to, violate a term of a disposition order may arrest the person.  s.672.91

After such an arrest, you must either:

"Canada-wide" Warrants

Although superior courts can issue arrest warrants which can be executed anywhere in Canada, most warrants are issued by provincial court judges and JPs.  Those warrants can only be executed in the province where they were issued, unless a justice in another province authorizes it. s.528.

If you know that authorities in another province will return a suspect there, you can:

  1. Arrest the suspect without warrant in your province, and then get an endorsement on the warrant.  However, you need grounds to make a warrantless arrest. That means informing yourself about the evidence against the suspect. R. v. Charles 2012 SKCA 34 Or:
  2. Get the warrant endorsed by a local JP, and then execute it.
Either way, you must bring the suspect before a justice.  s.503(1)

If you arrested first, you can ask the justice for up to 6 days to get the warrant endorsed.  s.503(3)

Detention

Detention differs from arrest.  You need reasonable and probable grounds to believe that the suspect committed an offence in order to arrest.  But if you have a reason, beyond mere hunch, to suspect a person of involvement in criminal activity, you may detain the person for a short time to investigate further.

Dedman (1985 SCC)  Wilson (1990 SCC) Ladouceur (1990 SCC) Hufsky (1988 SCC)  Cooper (2005 NSCA)

A warrant to search a residence is not an authority to arrest the occupants.  Crampton v. Walton 2005 ABCA 81.

However, you should control the scene by detaining the people you find in the residence, for the purposes of protecting yourselves and preventing damage to or destruction of evidence.

Police Release

Sections 496 to 503 oblige officers to release suspects with the least restrictions of liberty necessary under the circumstances.  This includes releasing with the intention to summons later.  See table.

Police Imposed Conditions

Sections 499 and 503 permit police officers and officers in charge to release suspects on undertakings and recognizances with specific conditions.  The two sections provide the same list of conditions.  Case law says you have an obligation to consider releasing any prisoner you can using this procedure.  Rashid 2010 ONCA 591.

For those conditions to remain in force, an information must be sworn before the date of the first appearance.[6]  The undertaking lasts until the charges are resolved by conviction, acquittal or stay, or the court changes them. (See Form 11.1)

Although that list of conditions can address many risks, they do not grant peace officers blanket authority to impose any condition necessary.  The most commonly misunderstood condition is the one addressed to witness and victim safety.  It does not permit conditions to protect potential future victims. 

Factors which justify more restrictive forms of release and more restrictive conditions are:

If no combination of the conditions will suffice to address these issues, then the accused must be brought before a justice for a bail hearing under s.515.  The justice may impose more restrictive conditions, using more restrictive release documents such as recognizance's with cash or surety, or the justice may detain the accused pending trial.

Swear the Information "As Soon As Practicable"

If you release a suspect on a promise to appear, appearance notice or recognizance before an officer in charge, then you must swear an information "as soon as practicable".  s.505  Failure to do so means the accused doesn't have to attend court.  Oliveira, 2009 ONCA 219.

Ordinarily, you want suspects to obey the terms of s.11.1 undertakings.  Even if you are a bit slow swearing one, but swear it before the promise to appear date, then the undertaking still binds the suspect.  Oliveira, 2009 ONCA 219.  But those undertakings expire on the PTA date if nobody swears an information before then.  Killaly, 2010 BCPC 138.

Unendorsed Warrants and Indictable Offences

Can a police officer release a prisoners charged with a straight indictable offence such as robbery, or arrested on unendorsed warrants?  Although there is some debate about the issue, the answer appears to be yes.  R. v. L. (M.C.), 2005 ONCJ 124; R. v. Monkman, 2005 YKTC 19.

Under s.503(2), you have a discretion to release such a prisoner, but only if you are satisfied that the prisoner "should be released".

Fingerprints

Some case law in B.C. suggests that you cannot fingerprint people until charges are laid.  (Click here for more discussion.)  Section 501(3) authorizes you to release a suspect on a promise to appear or recognizance, to provide fingerprints later, when the charge is sworn.  It's an offence under s.145(5) for the accused not to appear.

Forms of Police Release

The law requires you to choose the least restrictive form of release that you consider appropriate.  If, however, you have reasonable grounds to believe that a form of release fails to:

then you must move to a more restrictive form of release.  If no form of release available to you will suffice, then you must bring the offender before a justice.

If the offender was arrested for fear that they will commit an offence, then you must take the offender before a justice within 24 hours, or so soon as practicable.  S.503(4).  If there is an ongoing risk that the person will commit an offence, but has committed none so far, proceed with a peace bond application under s.810 or 810.1.  If the risk remains high, seek very restrictive conditions, such as 24-hour curfew to be reviewed weekly by the court.  It may be time to stake out your subject’s house.

Process

Offence

Type of Arrest

Residence of Accused

Authority

Release with intention to summons later.

497(1)(a)

(hybrid, abs jur, summary)

or

? 5 years

Not arrested

or

Arrested w/o warrant

Anywhere

Peace officer

s.497(1)(a)

OIC s.498(1)(a)

Appearance Notice

(hybrid, abs jur, summary) or

? 5 years

Not arrested

or

Arrested w/o warrant

Anywhere

Peace officer

s.496

s.497(1)(b)

Promise To Appear [youth]

Without conditions

All offences* in province

Arrested with or without warrant

Anywhere

OIC or another officer

s.498(b)

Promise To Appear [youth]

With UTA conditions** [youth]

All offences*in province

Arrested with or without warrant

Anywhere

OIC

s.499(2)

Recognizance before OIC [youth]

No deposit

no conditions

(hybrid, abs jur, summary)

or

? 5 years

Arrested without warrant

In the province and less than 200 km from here.

OIC or another officer

s.498(1)(c)

Recognizance before OIC [youth]

Up to $500 cash deposit

no conditions

(hybrid, abs jur, summary)

or

? 5 years

Arrested without warrant

Outside province or more than 200 km from here.

OIC or another officer

s.498(1)(d)

Recognizance before OIC [youth]

No deposit,

Specified conditions**

All offences*

Arrested with or without warrant

In the province and less than 200 km from here.

OIC s.499(2)(b)

Peace officer or OIC 503(2)

Recognizance before OIC [youth]

Up to $500 cash deposit

With UTA conditions**[youth]

All offences*

Arrested with or without warrant

Outside province or more than 200km from here.

OIC s.499(2)(c)

Peace officer or OIC 503(2)

Bail hearing

All offences*

Any arrest

Anywhere

JJP

s.515

 

*"All Offences" Exceptions:

People arrested without warrant for an indictable offence committed outside the local jurisdiction must be taken before a Justice.  S.503(3).

Offences committed outside the province are outside your jurisdiction.  You cannot serve them any document.  If the offence was indictable, however, you may seek a 6-day remand (s.503(3)) for police in another province to transport the accused
 

 Only a Supreme Court Judge may release people charged with the following offences:

47

Treason

61

Sedition

49

Alarming Her Majesty

74

Piracy

51

Intimidating Parliament

75

Piratical Acts

53

Inciting Mutiny

235

Murder

 

**Conditions

Sections 499and 503list the same set of conditions available to a peace officer.  Do not add conditions beyond what are found in this list; the courts won't enforce them.

(a) to remain within a territorial jurisdiction specified in the undertaking;

(b) to notify a peace officer or another person mentioned in the undertaking of any change in his or her address, employment or occupation;

(c) to abstain from communicating, directly or indirectly, with any victim, witness or other person identified in the undertaking, or from going to a place specified in the undertaking, except in accordance with the conditions specified in the undertaking;

(d) to deposit the person's passport with the peace officer or other person mentioned in the undertaking;

(e) to abstain from possessing a firearm and to surrender any firearm in the possession of the person and any authorization, licence or registration certificate or other document enabling that person to acquire or possess a firearm;

(f) to report at the times specified in the undertaking to a peace officer or other person designated in the undertaking;

(g) to abstain from

(i) the consumption of alcohol or other intoxicating substances, or

(ii) the consumption of drugs except in accordance with a medical prescription; and

(h) to comply with any other condition specified in the undertaking that the officer in charge considers necessary to ensure the safety and security of any victim of or witness to the offence.[6]

Classes of Offences

Absolute Jurisdiction offences are offences which proceed in Provincial Courtregardless whether the Crown proceeds summarily or by indictment.  None of them carry a penalty of more than 2 years’ punishment.

A summary conviction offence is tried in Provincial Court.  Neither the Crown nor the Defence have any option to proceed in any other way.  These offences usually carry a maximum punishment of 6 months.

Hybrid offences can be prosecuted summarily or by indictment, at the Crown’s option.


Absolute Jurisdiction

334 theft under $5,000

354 possession stolen property under $5,000

362(2)(b) false pretences under $5,000

380(1)(b) fraud under  $5,000

393 Fare fraud

733.1 Breach probation

811 Breach peace bond

201(1) gaming house

203 bookies

210(1) common bawdy house


Summary Conviction

66 Unlawful Assembly

83 Prize Fight

89 Weapon at public meeting

173(1) Indecent Act

175 Cause Disturbance

177 Trespass by Night

335 Take Auto without Consent

372 Indecent or Harassing Telephone Calls

446 Cruelty to Animals

 

CDSA 4(1) Possession of a controlled substance

 

All offences under Provincial statutes.

Hybrid Offences

57(2)    False statement for passport

72        Forcible Entry

86        Firearms – careless storage

87        Firarms – pointing

88        Possession of Weapon for a Dangerous purpose

90        Carry concealed weapon

91        Firearms – unauthorized possession

93        Firearm – possession in an unauthorized place

94        Firearm – possession in motor vehicle

95        Firearm – possession of restricted firearm

96        Firearm – possession of stolen firearm

97        Cross-bow transfer

101      Firearms – transfer

102      Firearms – making an automatic

104      Firearms – importing and exporting

105      Firearms – failing to report stolen guns

106      Firearms – failing to report destruction of

107      Firearms – false reports

108      Firearms – serial number offences

117.01 Firearms – possession while prohibited

129      Obstruct peace officer

130      Personating a Peace Officer

139(1)  Obstruct justice – Recognizances

140      Public Mischief

145      Escape lawful custody / breach UTA or Recog

151      Sexual interference

152      Invitation to sexual touching

153      Sexual Exploitation

159      Anal Intercourse

160      Bestiality

163      Corrupting morals

163      Child pornography

173(2) Exposure to a child under 16

168      Mailing obscenity

215      Failing to provide necessaries of life

249      Dangerous driving (no injury)

252      Fail to stop at accident

253      Impaired (no injury)

254      Refusal

259      Drive while prohibited

264      Criminal Harassment

264.1   Threat death/bodily harm

266      Assault

267      Assault w/ weapon or causing bodily harm

269      Unlawfully causing bodily harm

270      Assault peace officer

271      Sexual assault

279(2)  Forcible confinement

282      Abduction contrary to custody order

283      Abduction where no custody order

342      Credit card: stolen/forged

342.1   Unauthorized use of computer

347      Criminal Interest rate

348      B&E non-residential

349      Being unlawfully in a dwelling house

366      Forgery

368      Utter forged document

403      Personation

430(5)  Mischief to data

430(5.1) Mischief endangering life

437      False alarm

462.31 Laundering proceeds of crime

 

[1] A police officer who arrests an impaired driver may hold the driver if he has concerns that the driver is a danger to himself or others if released.  Tugnum 2002 BCSC 1572; Christiansen 2003 BCSC 1824.

[2]Collins v. Brantford Police Services 2001 Ont C.A.  A police officer attended a dispute between neighbors.  The trial court found as a fact that the concerns identified in s.495(2) were satisfied, but the appeal court said the trial judge erred in failing to consider the officer’s belief.  A judge in BC also applied this subjective analysis: R. v. Lau 2002 BCPC 294. See also R. v. Douglas 2003 BCPC 392 (same judge).

[3] In R. v. Effa 2005 BCPC 0574, the officer arrested a person who the judge thought didn't need to be arrested. But the judge conceded that the officer was entitled to arrest anyway. The judge agreed that the officer had reasonable and probable grounds to believe that the accused had committed an offence. The judge conceded that the officer might not have had reasonable and probable grounds to believe that the accused would not commit further offences. And so the arrest was lawful.
 Freeman v.
West Vancouver(District) (1992), 71 B.C.L.R. (2d) 387 (C.A.) Leave to appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada was denied: (1993), 77 B.C.L.R. (2d) xxxi  Police found an innocent man in a very suspicious situation.  He could not produce identification.  They arrested him.  He sued, unsuccessfully.

[4] In R. v. Dobrotic , (1997 NSCA) the court seemed to reverse the language of the section, so that the officers needed reasonable grounds to believe the public interest issues needed resolving before an officer could arrest.  Kucher v. Guasparini [1998] B.C.J. No. 582 (BCSC) says before arresting, the officer must consider whether the public interest concerns can be resolved some other way.  But Regina v. Sieben 51 C.C.C. (3d) 343 (Alta C.A.) points out that the analysis must be done in the heat of the moment, not with the luxury of afterthought.

[5]   For a horror show, see  Walkey, where 3 children were suspected of stealing a teddy bear.  They successfully sued for false arrest.  According to the court, the officer failed to consider the strength of the case, and arrested unnecessarily.

[6] The last one, (h) is not an open authority to impose any condition the police officer feels is appropriate.  See R. v Khan [2004] OJ 5301 (Ont Ct of Justice), Skordas 2001 ABPC 118  (Alta Prov Ct).

Top
Home
Contact